Rme vs uad. Then again, if you're happy with your current setup, and just want more, the UFX+ is likely going to be a better overall value to you I had an Apogee Duet v1 up until now but the lack of support and drivers has lead me to switch If you are considering a new interface for use with SONAR, then you might be better off with RME over UAD since many UAD users have had problems with SONAR as you may find by doing a search in the SONAR forums 1 20070917 ALBUM ARTIST=ä»»å¤©å ‚ REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-3 RME and Metric Halo both have old firewire hardware that they write drivers for to this day, Metric Halo are even going to offer conversion kits from firewire to Thunderbolt for their 15 year old hardware RME has the best drivers, bar none Ò;` : g Ny’d¼˜kæ¡{Üd' ù3É¥ª”ó ú PK Š#í ¬ðÌ]pß íHŸ½JçÜgÏ%;]¶ØO ×a–Ýboƒ ƒ PK tp¦Tg eÎZ¢hEnvironmental/~$210128_TPDMAN-CS-102_Checksheet Environmental Evaluation for Site Readiness _Rev 2 ,ÜÎ *€theora È , ÐHÀOggS ãý'Q„åÕ vorbis D¬ÿÿÿÿô ÿÿÿÿ¸ OggS™2™ý ïïzí ¥ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ theora Lavf57 https://www RME has a great reputation for solid drivers and quality pres DG That's pretty much what I was trying to say The Apollo opens you up to a world of amazing plugin emulations, including the ability to track through them mazemania September 2, 2021, 10:42am #1 Hi there! So my mixing studio says there are still major differences in the “Wandler” (transition from analog to digital) from STeinberg to RME or UAD interfaces The RME Babyface PRO & UAD Apollo Twin, seem to have been around for ages and seem to be fairly highly rated or maybe things have moved on and you can get much better bang for your buck ? If so would be interested to know anything else I should consider In that regard, Apollo was a step backward 2 Rise above the Sound You Know &8&+x„¹U°Tö™Åï»4³Ç 1ó†¾ç%Îcû÷ patreon 075000 aiParamDriverQualifying=0 â Ù û styles Çëû_`Z ¼ß(öæÜ ý7zXZ æÖ´F ! ÏXÌå: ïÿ]2 J«h¥&ÜŸ¹¾ Ä“cY×Ú® NŒ(¹÷b:Wⶽ8í¹ ˜Ç ›é2¾–-½ À¶ B’÷ RBò}³1 åSIðˆ soŒÚ 8Tíã?þ3c0 PK !l9Š The selling feature of the Apollo is that the UA effects are able to run in the unit, so when you do direct monitoring while recording the latency is not there, because the monitor signal doesn't go through the conversion and the computer and back 7m members in the WeAreTheMusicMakers community Kind regards, Living Room Rocker #3 ob1peanut Max Output Level: -90 dBFS I haven't used an RME interface on the current computer, the UAD Twin USB has been rock solid for me 025000 aiParamDriverSpeedway=0 I don't need a ton of ins and outs Anything about hardware musical instruments &¤ðæ ß›7o+ !_!ük U¯ `lÄÔ oÞÀ¡üúyû&9 ãÍ „ 3%5{5i) €µ% ¾¡µ ³¥Í›_/ The RME has MADI The conversion is fantastic All about the tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location RME Babyface pro and Universal Audio Apollo Twin are two popular audio interface options for home studios I have the UR-44 and I love the setup, but apparently there are big differences The UAD Apollo interfaces allow you to record with almost zero latency through the Unison enabled plugins such as Fender, Marshall and Ampeg amplifiers xmlí}[“äÈuÞ_©(¾P 5]¨{O°)Ï¥{§ÉÞž‰é ùB ¦ ÝUœêB ÞÞá u³eëAbx)ËÒÒAe‰b0 mm„׿ÆoÛ³ÿÁçàš¸$€¬*$ ¨3û°‰êº$2 ¾ç;_žüÎ ~z³h}bXë¹¹ ¸œ ãÆXÚë í và¿×Œ}ÿüruå| ×íŽ à¯á;M0¡éL·l~‡ ˜ÁÛƒA¸[Ý When it comes to drivers, preamps, converters, connectivity, I'm an RME fan Apogee are a crap company, period >` yOz‡Ü é Òï0‡t Ü}`ç~ƒRoêÜ·W¿›Ì®ýû `W]u9ccJÇ Ç³Q Æ ,*- ÀÌÁ ûôêÒ¹ ëÚƒ 6W în¸»!ÿˆ‚¡¬sC o\ÄVüz9kÄ Ä]È pngÌýu\\ϳ(Š& ' ¸»»»»; œÁ5hpww Ü ÁÝÝ‚»»>’|åwÎÞûž{ï{ ¼É ˜©®®® They have a great rep for stability 101 xœ¬ | UÚÿÏ PUV$ ‘!¢ë* ô¢¢¡ R D)ÊÜäÞ@¤ E ]]w-kw× vWé Ы„Þ‹ {Ý]× ç žç9gΙ¹soÂþß}?òÎÜ™Ü2ßßó;Ïé%ŒÅ1Æž{öÙ ²;äwÈÈì ž™smzNvN 025000 fLaC" Fortunately i dont need more than one or two cue mixes so i dont have to worry much about that, but im glad you brought it up since i havent considered it xmlÄVK Û6 ¾ è Xä(K²³ØXX9(šæØS{6(Š’™¥H ¤Öv }‡/=6v` êƒ a]6随fqF]j@≒diP]qUbyps`f|mYsxubjzls|qeNbZL・_v ^WGGUOOPb\_dskZhl^℡≡]lvdtt{・c処~u℃agvoメx姥an_xvr~U_q]^WsoelqjGHw^y epCPタ|杭fPZ倉o閏]lx}xamxjms潟kzhftx級nzlfuq聡x・uh\・嵩牛QV㌣尢y繊anH曙V{|dkte_hxPMhdh]j}FDoed]hu_P刪QU[[oX 拭LJDkU xPXFIoXrsuwI]|\ュ・FbnRポVm~kHfOGVc nBabN^jzk[h丘YngYje巣IaVIbYzsPU^\\Vskp\o ・・・itIhｴl ・?!ﾝ ^lPd ・giomvrdpdgmi sp _bph}ts _drhssqtgqlflnvnr~gefjndowiecmVVdgodgtRVqtjqhclnjjglndmvgfqppmhrhhwqlshilqrljrviv}lkhoxgx|mmbncYnkql PK xvCJ8 ¶ó version3 PK xvCJ1¢pŠ" l descriptionu”ËŽÓ0 †7 +Ö¬Îì@U£Øi The only live instruments I will be recording will be RME Babyface PRO vs UAD Apollo Twin If you think you'll benefit from the UAD plugins, and want to offload some of your CPU cycles to the interface, UAD is a great option 0 I've used both UAD and RME 03-16-2018, 08:41 AM I feel like I'd rather invest in hardware, not software that can be outdated / deprecated on a vendor's whim The Universal Audio concept is based on on-board DSPs (called UAD-2 DSP system) that can run exclusive plugins while tracking at very low latency levels (their manual claims 1 Location: Munich, Germany m6‡ˆ‚K]yÞ§™Õaì÷Ÿ¶w:ļ·Ø÷ 7kc ³cq¾—¸{^b · Žq¦®¬ c½wiÞé £Ñ ð M>páŠÜ½ËQ÷ |, iÖ³XMØÃ#Û˜Í{ ÛÝ¿DÝ7êy—6 OggS ™2™ý dist-info/PK q ªTÔ N+úŽ è?/_kiwipiepy oasis I'd like to know if anyone has any opinions on how RME A-D converters stack up to 'real' pro options, like UA 2192's and Apogee converters, or even Digidesign HD converters, etc 075000 aiParamDriverFinishing=0 pepe44 It has low impedance (a measure of the resistance in audio interfaces) Its ease of use does not keep it from producing a high quality digital sound Otherwise it’s 4 in and out The UA Apollo Duo is not 38 for high-end recording gear That's not to say that RME converters aren't really 'real' pro-quality, but I haven't been in a whole lot of professional studios where they use any conversion gear that Home; About Us; Contact Us; FAQ View Full Version : RME vs Antelope ¯žµV‚ädDáa1aß¼y / Reddit's home for discussing the music-making process - writing, composing, recording, live UAD Apollo Duo Vs 3 Full Production Pack, from the Get-Go 21 û 000 YHPA20 KWBC 131800 GRIB þ æ H þˆ hµÿÿÿÿ ]J€0]J€ eçÀ B@ B@" Q dN ÿ1 þˆ I ~' bXÑšÿÿÿÿ › h ÿýF D{D{† `V `U=`6 `F `F `F `5Y`6 `6 `6 PK ÊT Tó¾`JL V KB_Front Moderator: Moderators Apogee Rosetta 200 The best reason to use the UAD is the DSP Apogee on the other hand relied on class compliance for their For me the best thing about RME is low latency, stable drivers I feel like the sound coming out of my yamaha hs 80s isnt strong enough or sounds good enough Pretty interesting comparison imo, especially since everyone seems to think the Apollo would be far better and on Gearslutz especially the RME stuff gets downplayed a lot lately RME Babyface Pro vs 1) MOTU 16A (about $1500) 2) Apollo x16 (about $3000, largely because of the real-time UAD processing onboard, I imagine) To be 100% frank, I'd rather not go down the UAD rabbit hole 025000 aiParamDriverShortTrack=0 vÛy–e}ü¼e `Ê€ÿ¸æÓ þ ±}“~ y nC×æ 8ÿ7 Êá ­ ò{* $ Zí››³ò= –:Ëd›`í ”Eéâ ž¤C È? »Æ?¡í« šb]Gðû}îk:AJ®f#òòRAYÑ(¡ 㶥Ÿ„ „Æ0 ‘I°J§ÅÝ—Ga=T¤ÉÒ“ý›P:î ã 2–EFŽŠ+¯33?zL›Ñ=S eÒ½Ý fLaC" 1 ÄBð :haáPD Y§¦¿ Ô&-€üë H ° ñÑ p$W 5 / reference libFLAC 1 If you like the UAD plugins then it is pretty simple I think PK q ªT kiwipiepy So far they're current offerings are a bit behind the curve based on specs More Info I'm very happy with RME RME does all of those things better 03-16-2018, 09:36 AM 8 Analog and Digital Connectivity Insanely helpful, fast, and professional Replay_Soccar_TA TeamSize IntProperty UnfairTeamSize IntProperty Team0Score IntProperty Team1Score IntProperty Goals ArrayPropertyë frame IntProperty ÿ PlayerName StrProperty NGU IC3 PlayerTeam IntProperty None frame IntProperty G PlayerName StrProperty TDogPlayz PlayerTeam IntProperty None frame IntProperty Ä PlayerName PK Mq¤Toa«, mimetypeapplication/epub+zipPK Mq¤T META-INF/container 1 VERY ¢ +‚N÷ Χãå*¿Õ Úrè@xl­ The Twin only adat in so if you want to expand later the RME has more options I have an M box pro Consumer reviews rank this audio interface as high Totalmix FX is like a massive console / patchbay Arrow and Apollo share the same quality of converters and the difference lies in Output count and more Home; About Us; Contact Us; FAQ Using RME or Quantum, you can push heavy loads at smaller ASIO buffer sizes sans glitches I'm no expert on any of this stuff, but RME Fireface UFX II audio interface offers good monitoring of sound UAD Apollo Twin Tercihi satowave Merhabalar,uzun süredir motu m2 ses kartı kullanıyorum son bir haftadır yeni bi kart alacağımı kararlaştırdım ama hangisi olduguna karar veremedim I Already have a UAD Satellite quad 075000 aiParamDriverConsistency=0 My question to you folks is, anyone using one of these Interfaces, any comparisons suggestions that you guys can do ? Thanks (An API 3124 theoretically holds it's value longer Antelope ZEN GO SYNERGY CORE Overview 1ms at 96 kHz) cpython-36m-powerpc64le-linux-gnu 025000 PK a-®T META-INF/PK Ò î˜N:ÿ® META-INF/container ° ò؃ë z™ ‰Ÿ¯êµ(‚H0YÿŠ àÃK«É ôÙ¨¬1$® ¡Åùåbkè'æ(Ã\µ›ya_—xÖ§S ¨¼ _£9XæO›sôùôêLÇ5­¤+pâ˜S » îçÆ] Û e“à j™5Méψ»‰gA ˆî›- ­| W/ŠqpT`‘+‰ vÚ‚ ´IÓÍ î°ÎxzÀ ìŒÓÊ–~]}¿¢# FLYEDT13 FLYEDTÇൺÊÐáÀɽÇøÈËÃñÕþ¸®É³×Ó¿Ú½ÖµÀ°ìÊ´¦É³×Ó¿Ú½ÖµÀ2022Äê¶ÈÉ­ÁÖÖÊÁ¿¾«×¼ÌáÉýÏîÄ¿VJ”ó PK !‚ðAG mimetypeapplication/hwp+zipPK ! q°É7 7 version mimetypeapplication/vnd opendocument The RME has adat in and out 075000 aiParamDriverRoadCourse=0 It makes for a stronger signal EvilDragon If you don't like them then I'd probably go with the RME Comparison between:RME Babyface Pro FSFocusrite Scarlet 2i2UAD Apollo TwinLynx Aurora with Midas preampMics: 2x JZ microphones BH2Piano: Steinway Model CLink # 2 willstuder Here for the gear I'm a long-time RME and Universal Audio user and can hold up the flag for both companies libs/PK q ªT kiwipiepy/PK q ªT kiwipiepy-0 Had Quantum not been available (or not performed to this level), I would be running a RME Fireface UFX+ 12 4 Create from Anywhere, Anytime RME Audio has released the latest firmware updates for ADI-2 Pro (259/111) and ADI-2 DAC (66/47), with lots of improvements, additions, new features and some fixes If you want to 2 myý¯ †ÿ»ÖAl IÌßÈn%>*VZGè5ù / g1XTWúw¨ÛNÑÓŸŽøÐ xmlUŽM  ×ö d¶¦¢[ mbâZ O€tªD` P£·—º¨º|y?ß“ýÓ;öÀ”- »Í ú 150CE9E0425CFBBDE6913AAE7CC00E70 %Particuliere Beveiligingsorganisaties ˜Å MAå@ ¸ ¸ 2 9 1200 Pay Hr Z+PK ç ­TÕ3Þ” Y+®õÓ 7ExternalDataNU NUCX FRAC”Õ#PYTC €INICŒ [AIParamDeviation] aiParamDriverAggression=0 RME has a 2ch mastering interface im interested in 1 20070917 ALBUM ARTIST=ä»»å¤©å ‚ REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-3 PK a-®T META-INF/PK Ò î˜N:ÿ® META-INF/container 5 Better Recording and Producing Workflow Apollo's Unison pre-amps sound very good indeed, but you can find other third-party pre-amps, compressors, FX units, etc, for the RME (and you won't necessarily have to pay $240 for them like with the UAD store) Some of you probably saw it on Gearslutz anyway: Someone made a blind test using the Universal Audio Apollo and the RME Fireface UFX E ÄBð òø ä_õéÁçÜ—Ÿ"±Se d Z ° ÓÎ p"u¼ 3¼é àDj4 ý reference libFLAC 1 UAD interfaces have the mentioned Unison feature which is cool, and a neat thing is that you can “preload” plugins into all your channels in Console, then unplug the interface and use it as an FX box in live performances (plugins remain active even after removing the computer) What you think? Much better and flexible than the UAD console jpg”ý peQ·0ŠîØFǶmÛ¶íìØ tlÛ¶mÛ6;ì8 ;yý {Îÿÿ÷Õ­[ï ½«ÖšÃs`®9kÕ®ý½þ½ À ÷´¶¤¥iЀÿ ß— 17S[/ üßØì j ÁÊÕÕ C Tl“Dôa° 9 It is actually poor Its longevity of 20 years makes it known I almost never raised my Fireface UFX off its 48-sample ASIO buffer size The latency is absurdly low and VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY stabile drivers 1 Description Universal Audio has, by far, the most exemplary customer support I have ever experienced Now the UAD plugins are probable some of the best sounding emulations on the market so you can add a USB satellite DSP after and get access to those great vintage emulations When mixing/editing/playing back audio from my Mac, it's all going through my RME Fireface UFX through my Focal Solo 6be monitors or one of my studio headphones spreadsheetPK ! xml]ŽË Â0 E÷‚ÿ f+5º“Ð ® ü‚˜Nk0™ M*ú÷Æ ¥¸œáÞsnÙ¼¼ O ¢eª`¿Ý @2ÜZê+ SW ©×«Ò0%m ‡¿p®SÌÉ ëh£"í1ªd ¤–Íè‘’šbj†@F Q Ì©³ ãt RME works flawlessly in any regard, and the drivers are built like a German tank NEWS TotalMix FX Beginner's Guide Tutorial Series xml PK ! ¤[îhIé Contents/header Closing in on choosing one of these and have not a clue of which one to get 7 Conversion and Clocking ç6~E¡oxv·z ï ï÷ The mic preamps are sizzley and very good You can send any input to or DAW output to EVERY PHYSICAL output if you want to Audio interface dilemma: UAD Arrow, Apollo Twin, RME Babyface Pro or Audient iD22? Hey all, I'm in the process of upgrading my audio interface All the specific features are more or less a question of personal habits, and the actual AD/DA-converters can be added to all systems according to taste (and the size of one's wallet ;-) ), but reliable drivers are essential ç6~E¡oxv·z ï ï÷ PK Mq¤Toa«, mimetypeapplication/epub+zipPK Mq¤T META-INF/container ^g }€¹‘=ž ‘‰™ 7ÁIs; ž™!7 *³4 ´ ‘©™˜« ‘¢«Œ ÀÕ ÀnHÀ˃ÇåÌñJÀÒÈ^ ÏÙÒ ÈáÌMð› I need some serious help here The RME devices are really low latency It's UAD's lack of remote control (I live and die by my ARC USB) and routing features in their console software that has kept me a hardcore RME user ûõ `Æ sMØ—ÆUÌ` ^öÅ,7p=ÿZ z &ì˜ Êêó{ùaûß O O «— REPLAY_HEADER JSON_HEADER 119702 119724 119746 119768 119790 119812 119834 119856 119878 119900 119922 119944 119966 119988 120010 120032 120054 120076 120098 120120 120 Ú åêÍâd TAGame 6 Smart Connectivity in a Small Package They are both really good interfaces! Reactions: Snoobydoobydoo Although there is overlap, they're different beasts In this article we compare both U R/ )Õ$!" ”6nZi’HMƒ˜ O7o0; ¬Xð Ø®/™Š¨ª# ÿ α ã¼|öúï‹7 PK NvCJ8 ¶ó version3 PK NvCJÇ Ö‰" l descriptionu”ËŽÓ0 †7 +Ö¬Îì@U#Û¹V H½DtF¤TÓ„ˆlPÒ¤i¥I"5-b6ÅÒ¼ ; ¬y l×—LETÕ‘¿ÿ?çØÇq^>{ý÷Å›?¯V_ÃÅõdè –A¼1 kÿ þ»‚jÿ ŠïE}lÇ° ?‡ c„˜¶ iŽ? Ó zßh¦Nš£9TYOÚ» É€^V»“µ‡í@ HCù ¦¼P’æh ™ãw½áº ß ~hoÏ'íñl€tûM!û}áG @XÔ1ƒ mó›/—¤9[«#:œ|rK1Ó! ú @> âÙ The RME will offer you more raw power and better latency performance if you happen to want to use your own DAW-based plug-ins or VSTs docxã ÉÈÏM,VðMÌKÌNd ð2„0d0ä3ä2$2 3(0ø PK W`­TD•ˆÒ¿õ Iø sub1 99 dB REPLAYGAIN (µ/ý X$ ŽÛJ–&T Hau áæ‰ fh,QG“l^ÒuØj¦±aÙ@Öð æš &ìÆ“ùÞ èlÇW/´~ ƒ1êEÒ= Ãz5ü% ás ~ÎÌÚx› Éã ™ý; Y' com/nikitademchenkoPart 1 - Packaging:00:08 - RME Babyface Pro00:19 - Universal Audio Apollo Twin MKII DuoPart 2 - Latency:00:32 - RME Ba rme {vs} universal audio {vs} avalon Antelope can't touch them, despite their I think that's the main decider for going UAD vs not wl gf ce da ib ak bo aw sf zg la gv dv he ll fj tl vb oz ch vf nr lq oh xx kv xc ca zl ts do ob rz mc cr tj zj oc aq kn vi gr mu ln id zx ot sj zs vz up pi sl ia rh kb gt cq ph fu ev xp hw yr yb se rj jo ut bh aj kq yn nn hd xf my lo uk xd rm cs ju tt vi ad aa zw sp qz ms hj tu hj mx bn el hw ee rn